<p>➀ China and the US invested $150 billion and $250 billion respectively over a decade in semiconductor subsidies, yet failed to develop leading-edge process technology due to mismanagement;</p><p>➁ China allocated funds to inexperienced firms, while US subsidies supported capacity expansions that companies would have pursued independently;</p><p>➂ Intel, after receiving $8 billion in US subsidies and facing repeated delays in advanced process development, sparked political backlash, with its CEO pressured to resign.</p>
Related Articles
- CXL is Finally Coming in 202510 months ago
- Samsung Foundry struggles12 months ago
- The Illusionist19 days ago
- Mouser stocking Intel Ethernet network adapter for OCP 3.028 days ago
- US messes up its Chips Act29 days ago
- Being A Good Guesserabout 2 months ago
- White House confirms talks to acquire 10% stake in Intel — 'We should get an equity stake for our money'about 2 months ago
- SoftBank to buy $2 billion in Intel shares at $23 each — firm still owns majority share of Armabout 2 months ago
- Lip-Bu Tan writes to Intel employees2 months ago
- 100% tariffs on US chip imports2 months ago