1. An 8%+ yield may initially seem attractive, but fundamental flaws emerge upon reviewing the fund's financial statements and distribution history. 2. Management has incurred losses on options writing, and return-of-capital distributions and a negative CAGR indicate subpar portfolio management practices. 3. BST has underperformed in terms of capital appreciation compared to other tech-focused ETFs like QQQM. Better alternatives exist, such as STK.
Related Articles
- USA: Better Alternatives Available (Downgrade)10 months ago
- Energy Dividend Stocks: I Like Kinder Morgan, But Love Enterprise Products Partners11 days ago
- AT&T Stock: Is This Free Cash Flow Machine A Buy On The Dip?20 days ago
- Nebius: Overvaluation Miss Becomes A Win (Rating Upgrade)about 1 month ago
- Petrobras: Oil Giant With Exceptional Margins Worth The Political Riskabout 2 months ago
- 11 Ways To Profit From Nvidia, Regardless Of What Happens From Hereabout 2 months ago
- YMAX's 66% Yield: The Dark Side Of Its Weekly Payouts2 months ago
- Bank of Montreal: Tallying The Scorecard4 months ago
- Quantitative Comparison Makes Coca-Cola A Top Pick For Long-Term Investors5 months ago
- High-Quality Dividend Growth Stocks Near 52-Week Lows: Alphabet Is Astounding6 months ago